Mar 30 (3 months ago)
Gert
wrote
I use AI a lot and have tested ChatGPT against Gemini, which is developed by Google. It’s clear that Gemini provides more professional descriptions, better-written texts, and stronger product names. Most notably, the meta titles and meta descriptions are significantly better in the final result.
ChatGPT is an excellent tool for coding and many other tasks, but when it comes to creating content that performs well on Google, it's obvious that Gemini has the upper hand. It feels like Gemini is more in tune with what Google is looking for.
I'm currently exploring how to make Gemini handle tasks for my webshop, rather than being limited to your built-in AI module. It reminds me of Apple’s ecosystem – you're forced to use what they decide. There’s no open option to choose which AI system you want to use.
I hope you take this seriously and begin planning for a future where users can select alternative AI systems instead of being locked into yours.
Additionally, I want to emphasize how impressed I am with Gemini Advanced compared to ChatGPT. I’m very interested in using Gemini Advanced because it clearly performs much better when it comes to handling product descriptions, title tags, and product names. I’ve tested both systems using the exact same prompts, and the quality of the output is completely different. Gemini Advanced simply delivers a much more professional result – especially for a webshop.
ChatGPT is an excellent tool for coding and many other tasks, but when it comes to creating content that performs well on Google, it's obvious that Gemini has the upper hand. It feels like Gemini is more in tune with what Google is looking for.
I'm currently exploring how to make Gemini handle tasks for my webshop, rather than being limited to your built-in AI module. It reminds me of Apple’s ecosystem – you're forced to use what they decide. There’s no open option to choose which AI system you want to use.
I hope you take this seriously and begin planning for a future where users can select alternative AI systems instead of being locked into yours.
Additionally, I want to emphasize how impressed I am with Gemini Advanced compared to ChatGPT. I’m very interested in using Gemini Advanced because it clearly performs much better when it comes to handling product descriptions, title tags, and product names. I’ve tested both systems using the exact same prompts, and the quality of the output is completely different. Gemini Advanced simply delivers a much more professional result – especially for a webshop.
Reply
4 Answers
Apr 02 (3 months ago)
Ira Kobylianska
agent
wrote
Thank you for submitting the feature request
We are considering adding other AI tools, including Gemini in future versions.
Let's wait for votes
We are considering adding other AI tools, including Gemini in future versions.
Let's wait for votes
Jul 10 (2 days ago)
Gert
wrote
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to you again regarding a matter I first raised on March 31st, to which you replied on April 1st. My inquiry concerns your choice of AI tool within your system and the limitations this imposes.
I am aware that you currently exclusively use a solution based on ChatGPT. Unfortunately, this approach feels as closed as an Apple ecosystem, where users are limited to the choices the manufacturer makes on their behalf. I find this problematic.
The future of e-commerce is closely tied to the ability to produce strong, relevant, and search-engine-optimized content. Good AI tools are therefore not just a bonus, but a crucial part of our toolkit. By locking the platform to a single product, which in my view is not optimal for the task, you are hindering our development rather than promoting it.
My experience shows a significant difference:
ChatGPT: I find that the texts it generates are often short, amateurish, and unsuitable for creating long, in-depth descriptions. This is a known weakness of the model for this type of task.
Google Gemini: Through numerous tests, I have found that Gemini delivers significantly better results. Using the exact same detailed prompts, Gemini generates long, well-formulated, and relevant descriptions tailored to my categories and website. The result is clear: The category descriptions I have created with Gemini achieve significantly better rankings in Google's search results. This is likely because Gemini, as part of the Google ecosystem, has a deeper understanding of what creates visibility on the search engine.
When I use the tool you have forced me to use, the results are lacking. I simply do not achieve the desired effect, which means that in practice, I have to find a third-party tool to get the job done correctly.
You have updated your system several times this year, but I see no real development on the AI front. We are living in 2025, where technological development is moving extremely fast. If you do not plan to open up to other and better AI models, I fear you will lose customers to competing platforms that offer greater flexibility.
Therefore, I need a clear answer:
Do you intend to continue relying exclusively on your current solution?
Will you open up for the integration of other AI models, such as Google Gemini, in the near future?
Was your response on April 1st an April Fools' joke, or can I expect concrete action based on my inquiry?
I await a serious and comprehensive response on how you plan to address this critical part of your product development.
I am writing to you again regarding a matter I first raised on March 31st, to which you replied on April 1st. My inquiry concerns your choice of AI tool within your system and the limitations this imposes.
I am aware that you currently exclusively use a solution based on ChatGPT. Unfortunately, this approach feels as closed as an Apple ecosystem, where users are limited to the choices the manufacturer makes on their behalf. I find this problematic.
The future of e-commerce is closely tied to the ability to produce strong, relevant, and search-engine-optimized content. Good AI tools are therefore not just a bonus, but a crucial part of our toolkit. By locking the platform to a single product, which in my view is not optimal for the task, you are hindering our development rather than promoting it.
My experience shows a significant difference:
ChatGPT: I find that the texts it generates are often short, amateurish, and unsuitable for creating long, in-depth descriptions. This is a known weakness of the model for this type of task.
Google Gemini: Through numerous tests, I have found that Gemini delivers significantly better results. Using the exact same detailed prompts, Gemini generates long, well-formulated, and relevant descriptions tailored to my categories and website. The result is clear: The category descriptions I have created with Gemini achieve significantly better rankings in Google's search results. This is likely because Gemini, as part of the Google ecosystem, has a deeper understanding of what creates visibility on the search engine.
When I use the tool you have forced me to use, the results are lacking. I simply do not achieve the desired effect, which means that in practice, I have to find a third-party tool to get the job done correctly.
You have updated your system several times this year, but I see no real development on the AI front. We are living in 2025, where technological development is moving extremely fast. If you do not plan to open up to other and better AI models, I fear you will lose customers to competing platforms that offer greater flexibility.
Therefore, I need a clear answer:
Do you intend to continue relying exclusively on your current solution?
Will you open up for the integration of other AI models, such as Google Gemini, in the near future?
Was your response on April 1st an April Fools' joke, or can I expect concrete action based on my inquiry?
I await a serious and comprehensive response on how you plan to address this critical part of your product development.
Jul 11 (44 hours ago)
Ira Kobylianska
agent
wrote
Thank you for your detailed reply.
We are planning to add other AI tools in the future. We are not planning to rely on ChatGPT exclusively.
At the moment, we're making major and critical releases that will improve the work of the application overall (the work with large databases, indexes, and new TLS). Those releases were pre-scheduled for Summer as it is low season, so no other major tasks can be added to the current sprint.
When considering adding any new tools and integrations, we are considering the number of requests that we have from paid customers, our current workload, and the time it will take for us to implement one.
Please note that adding new AI does not end when the release is done. It is an obligation to keep supporting and adding new versions, check the compatibility, apply updates when the API is changed, etc. As it is an ongoing process, and keeping in mind that at the moment we had only a few requests on adding other AI tools, except ChatGPT (including Deepseek AI, specific translation LLM models, and local LLM models), the implementation has not been scheduled yet.
We value your feedback and would like to encourage other Store Manager users to comment on this post and speed up the implementation of Gemini specifically.
We are planning to add other AI tools in the future. We are not planning to rely on ChatGPT exclusively.
At the moment, we're making major and critical releases that will improve the work of the application overall (the work with large databases, indexes, and new TLS). Those releases were pre-scheduled for Summer as it is low season, so no other major tasks can be added to the current sprint.
When considering adding any new tools and integrations, we are considering the number of requests that we have from paid customers, our current workload, and the time it will take for us to implement one.
Please note that adding new AI does not end when the release is done. It is an obligation to keep supporting and adding new versions, check the compatibility, apply updates when the API is changed, etc. As it is an ongoing process, and keeping in mind that at the moment we had only a few requests on adding other AI tools, except ChatGPT (including Deepseek AI, specific translation LLM models, and local LLM models), the implementation has not been scheduled yet.
We value your feedback and would like to encourage other Store Manager users to comment on this post and speed up the implementation of Gemini specifically.
Jul 11 (32 hours ago)
Gert
wrote
Dear Ira,
Following our previous correspondence, I must state the strategic urgency of this issue in the strongest possible terms, as I believe its importance is being fundamentally underestimated.
The future of e-commerce success is not just traditional SEO; it is AI Optimization (AIO). It is widely predicted that by 2026, a majority of search results will be AI-generated answers. To even be considered by these new models, a webpage needs deep, relevant content: long-form descriptions well over 500 words, integrated FAQs, and rich, structured data. A simple, short category text will soon be worthless. I am not sure how many of your other customers know this, but I do, because I am actively working to future-proof my business.
To show you this is not a theoretical problem but a tangible failure of your current tool, please see the direct comparison I have prepared below. I used the exact same detailed prompt for a category on my Dansih webshop (https://www.ctiparty.dk) in both your current ChatGPT-based tool and in Gemini Advanced.
________________________________________
Test Case: Category Description
PROMPT USED: File 1
________________________________________
RESULT from ChatGPT: File 2
________________________________________
RESULT from Gemini Advanced: File 3
________________________________________
As you can see, the difference is not a matter of small nuances; it's a fundamental difference in capability. The Gemini output is substantially more detailed, better structured for SEO, and written in a professional tone suitable for a high-ranking e-commerce site. This is precisely where your current tool fails. ChatGPT is incapable of producing the long, structured, and deep content required for the future. Even with a carefully crafted prompt, its response was a complete failure for this purpose.
So when you say your team is busy with other 'critical' tasks like databases, you are telling me that the single most important tool for customer acquisition and future-proofing our businesses is not your priority. From my perspective as a business owner who has acquired five competitors in the last three years, this is a sign that you are in a state of decommissioning , not development . You are not building the future for your clients.
I cannot wait for your platform to catch up while my business falls behind. My company's future depends on staying ahead. Therefore, I must inform you that I have already begun researching alternative platforms and third-party modules. I am actively looking for a replacement for your product.
I've noticed I am not the first to raise this; a user in June 2024 brought this up and received no substantive reply, which I consider a failure. You have a choice: be a leader that provides the best, forward-thinking tools, or be a follower that waits for overwhelming demand, by which time your most ambitious customers will have already left.
I am deeply disappointed. I require a clear and immediate commitment to integrating a demonstrably superior AI. Without it, I will have no choice but to proceed with finding a new partner who is serious about the future.
Sincerely,
Following our previous correspondence, I must state the strategic urgency of this issue in the strongest possible terms, as I believe its importance is being fundamentally underestimated.
The future of e-commerce success is not just traditional SEO; it is AI Optimization (AIO). It is widely predicted that by 2026, a majority of search results will be AI-generated answers. To even be considered by these new models, a webpage needs deep, relevant content: long-form descriptions well over 500 words, integrated FAQs, and rich, structured data. A simple, short category text will soon be worthless. I am not sure how many of your other customers know this, but I do, because I am actively working to future-proof my business.
To show you this is not a theoretical problem but a tangible failure of your current tool, please see the direct comparison I have prepared below. I used the exact same detailed prompt for a category on my Dansih webshop (https://www.ctiparty.dk) in both your current ChatGPT-based tool and in Gemini Advanced.
________________________________________
Test Case: Category Description
PROMPT USED: File 1
________________________________________
RESULT from ChatGPT: File 2
________________________________________
RESULT from Gemini Advanced: File 3
________________________________________
As you can see, the difference is not a matter of small nuances; it's a fundamental difference in capability. The Gemini output is substantially more detailed, better structured for SEO, and written in a professional tone suitable for a high-ranking e-commerce site. This is precisely where your current tool fails. ChatGPT is incapable of producing the long, structured, and deep content required for the future. Even with a carefully crafted prompt, its response was a complete failure for this purpose.
So when you say your team is busy with other 'critical' tasks like databases, you are telling me that the single most important tool for customer acquisition and future-proofing our businesses is not your priority. From my perspective as a business owner who has acquired five competitors in the last three years, this is a sign that you are in a state of decommissioning , not development . You are not building the future for your clients.
I cannot wait for your platform to catch up while my business falls behind. My company's future depends on staying ahead. Therefore, I must inform you that I have already begun researching alternative platforms and third-party modules. I am actively looking for a replacement for your product.
I've noticed I am not the first to raise this; a user in June 2024 brought this up and received no substantive reply, which I consider a failure. You have a choice: be a leader that provides the best, forward-thinking tools, or be a follower that waits for overwhelming demand, by which time your most ambitious customers will have already left.
I am deeply disappointed. I require a clear and immediate commitment to integrating a demonstrably superior AI. Without it, I will have no choice but to proceed with finding a new partner who is serious about the future.
Sincerely,