Jun 02, 2024
Erkan Cicekci wrote
Can you more than 1 AI not only ChatGPT such as Gemini Pro ollama etc. So we can compare results.
New
3 votes
Vote
Reply
3 Answers
Jul 10 (16 days ago)
Gert
wrote
I would like to second the question raised by Erkan Cicekci on June 2, 2024, regarding the possibility of integrating more AI models than just ChatGPT. I want to elaborate on why this is an absolutely critical feature for us as users.
I previously raised a similar point myself on March 31st, to which you replied on April 1st. The issue is that the current solution, which is based exclusively on ChatGPT, feels like a closed ecosystem. This limits us and prevents us from using the best tools for the job.
For those of us in e-commerce, the ability to produce strong, search-engine-optimized content is paramount. By locking the platform to a single product that is not optimal for the task, you are hindering our development.
My experience shows a significant difference, which underscores Erkan's point about being able to compare results:
ChatGPT: I find that the texts it generates are often short, amateurish, and unsuitable for creating the long, in-depth descriptions we need.
Google Gemini: Through numerous tests, I have found that Gemini delivers significantly better results. Using the exact same detailed prompts, Gemini generates long, well-formulated, and relevant descriptions tailored to our websites. The result is clear: The category descriptions I have created with Gemini achieve significantly better rankings in Google's search results.
When I use the tool you force me to use, the results are lacking. In practice, this means I have to use a third-party tool to get the job done correctly, which undermines the value of your system.
You have updated your system several times this year, but there is no real development on the AI front. We are in 2025, and if you do not open up to better AI models, I fear you will lose customers to more flexible platforms.
Therefore, I am reiterating my previous questions and fully support Erkan's request:
Do you intend to continue relying exclusively on your current solution?
Will you open up for the integration of other AI models, such as Google Gemini, in the near future so we can compare and choose the best tool?
Was your reply to me on April 1st an April Fools' joke, or can I expect concrete action?
There are multiple users requesting this flexibility, and we await a serious and comprehensive response on how you will address this critical part of your product development.
I previously raised a similar point myself on March 31st, to which you replied on April 1st. The issue is that the current solution, which is based exclusively on ChatGPT, feels like a closed ecosystem. This limits us and prevents us from using the best tools for the job.
For those of us in e-commerce, the ability to produce strong, search-engine-optimized content is paramount. By locking the platform to a single product that is not optimal for the task, you are hindering our development.
My experience shows a significant difference, which underscores Erkan's point about being able to compare results:
ChatGPT: I find that the texts it generates are often short, amateurish, and unsuitable for creating the long, in-depth descriptions we need.
Google Gemini: Through numerous tests, I have found that Gemini delivers significantly better results. Using the exact same detailed prompts, Gemini generates long, well-formulated, and relevant descriptions tailored to our websites. The result is clear: The category descriptions I have created with Gemini achieve significantly better rankings in Google's search results.
When I use the tool you force me to use, the results are lacking. In practice, this means I have to use a third-party tool to get the job done correctly, which undermines the value of your system.
You have updated your system several times this year, but there is no real development on the AI front. We are in 2025, and if you do not open up to better AI models, I fear you will lose customers to more flexible platforms.
Therefore, I am reiterating my previous questions and fully support Erkan's request:
Do you intend to continue relying exclusively on your current solution?
Will you open up for the integration of other AI models, such as Google Gemini, in the near future so we can compare and choose the best tool?
Was your reply to me on April 1st an April Fools' joke, or can I expect concrete action?
There are multiple users requesting this flexibility, and we await a serious and comprehensive response on how you will address this critical part of your product development.
Jul 14 (12 days ago)
Ira Kobylianska
agent
wrote
Thank you for providing details.
As mentioned earlier, we have very few requests for other AIs. That's why none were added.
I have escalated your request to the developers. We will be able to include your request in the September sprint. We hope more customers will need this feature as well.
We welcome other users to join this discussion.
As mentioned earlier, we have very few requests for other AIs. That's why none were added.
I have escalated your request to the developers. We will be able to include your request in the September sprint. We hope more customers will need this feature as well.
We welcome other users to join this discussion.
Jul 16 (10 days ago)
Erkan Cicekci
wrote
Hey Gert. Thank you for your support. To be honest I am not really happy with any commercial AIs in this point. They all looks similar. They always use similar words on every single product. Their results all looks similar. Best results i get actually from local AI models such as customized Deepseek, gemma3 and qwen3.